Tuesday, December 10, 2024
HomeTop StoriesAmazon broke federal labor law by racially disparaging union leaders

Amazon broke federal labor law by racially disparaging union leaders

Published on

Latest articles

HORIZON MICROTECHNOLOGIES RECEIVES ESA SPARK FUNDING TO ADVANCE 3D PRINTING AND METALLISATION TECHNOLOGY FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS

HORIZON MICROTECHNOLOGIES RECEIVES ESA SPARK FUNDING TO ADVANCE 3D PRINTING AND METALLISATION TECHNOLOGY FOR...

GreenPlast 2025: Shaping a Sustainable Future for Plastics

GreenPlast 2025: Shaping a Sustainable Future for Plastics At the official streaming press conference on...

Tosca Partners with Avery Dennison to Boost Supply Chain Efficiency and Reduce C02 Emissions

Tosca Partners with Avery Dennison to Boost Supply Chain Efficiency and Reduce C02 Emissions Tosca...

Automechanika Dubai Supports The UAE’s EMobility Goals With a Platform For Innovation And Collaboration

Automechanika Dubai Supports The UAE’s EMobility Goals With a Platform For Innovation And Collaboration The...


Amazon and consultants for the company violated federal labor law by interrogating and threatening employees regarding their union activities, and racially disparaging organizers who were seeking to unionize a Staten Island warehouse, a National Labor Relations Board judge ruled.

The NLRB said Friday that Administrative Law Judge Lauren Esposito found Amazon “committed multiple violations” of federal labor law at its largest warehouse in New York, called JFK8, between May and October 2021, a period that saw an increase in organizing activity.

In April 2022, employees voted to join the Amazon Labor Union, a grassroots group of current and former workers, becoming the first unionized Amazon facility in the U.S. Since that victory, the group has been fighting to reach a contract with Amazon. 

The judge in New York heard testimony from Amazon employees, managers and labor consultants in virtual hearings that went on for almost a year. Esposito determined Amazon illegally confiscated organizing pamphlets from employees that were being distributed in on-site breakrooms and conducted surveillance of employees’ organizing activities.

Amazon also violated labor laws when it sent an employee at a neighboring facility to JFK8 home early from his shift and changed his work assignments in retaliation for supporting the union, the judge found. The employee, Daequan Smith, sorted packages at a delivery station called DYY6, down the street from JFK8, and was later fired in Nov. 2021. The union alleged Smith’s firing was in retaliation to his union activities.

Additionally, the judge found that Amazon broke the law when a “union avoidance” consultant, Bradley Moss, who was hired by the company, threatened employees, telling them it would be “futile” to vote to join the ALU. Amazon and other companies often hire labor consultants like Moss, referred to as “persuaders,” to dissuade workers from unionizing. The company spent $14 million on anti-union consultants in 2022, the Huffington Post reported in March, citing disclosure forms filed with the Department of Labor.

As a result of the ruling, Amazon will be required to post notices reminding workers of their rights at its JFK8 and DYY6 facilities. The company also has to make Smith “whole for any loss of earnings and other benefits,” the NLRB said.

In one exchange with a JFK8 employee, Natalie Monarrez, Moss discussed the union campaign at another Amazon facility, BHM1, in Bessemer, Alabama. Monarrez said Moss told her the Bessemer campaign was “not a serious union drive,” but a “Black Lives Matter protest about social injustice.”

“Moss then pointed to the front of the JFK8 warehouse and said, ‘Just like these guys out here, they’re just a bunch of thugs,'” Esposito wrote in her judgment, citing testimony from Monarrez.

Amazon spokesperson Eileen Hards said in a statement that company is reviewing the judge’s decision and weighing its next steps based on the ruling.

“We disagree with certain decisions within the ruling, but are glad the judge agreed that the terminated individual should not be reinstated,” Hards added.

Moss didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Employees at BHM1 voted against joining the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union in April 2021, but the results of the election were tossed after the NLRB found Amazon improperly interfered in the vote. A do-over election was held last year, but the results remain too close to call.

Amazon’s labor record has been scrutinized heavily, especially as union organizing ramped up in its warehouse and delivery workforce during the Covid pandemic. The company faces 240 open or settled unfair labor practice charges across 26 states, according to the NLRB, concerning a range of allegations, including its conduct around union elections.

The company has also clashed with Chris Smalls, a former Amazon employee and one of the leaders of ALU. A leaked memo obtained by Vice revealed David Zapolsky, Amazon’s general counsel, had referred to Smalls, a Black man, as “not smart or articulate,” and recommended making him “the face” of efforts to organize workers.

Amazon continues to challenge the JFK8 election results, as well as the NLRB and the union’s conduct during the drive. The agency upheld the results of the election in January.

WATCH: Amazon favored ‘Magnificent Seven’ stock



Source link

More like this

HORIZON MICROTECHNOLOGIES RECEIVES ESA SPARK FUNDING TO ADVANCE 3D PRINTING AND METALLISATION TECHNOLOGY FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS

HORIZON MICROTECHNOLOGIES RECEIVES ESA SPARK FUNDING TO ADVANCE 3D PRINTING AND METALLISATION TECHNOLOGY FOR...

GreenPlast 2025: Shaping a Sustainable Future for Plastics

GreenPlast 2025: Shaping a Sustainable Future for Plastics At the official streaming press conference on...

Tosca Partners with Avery Dennison to Boost Supply Chain Efficiency and Reduce C02 Emissions

Tosca Partners with Avery Dennison to Boost Supply Chain Efficiency and Reduce C02 Emissions Tosca...